I admit. I do not miss a chapter, especially because I am a lover of suspense. And whatever of anyone else, this series keeps me "with Jesus in the mouth" and the question mark in the head, because from the beginning I wonder who the killer, who the murder, what are the ways and reasons. However, I disagree with the fundamental idea of \u200b\u200bthe program.
The reasons vary: some women kill because of some disorder, bigotry, jealousy, revenge. However, most cases share a fact: they were battered. Finally, in all, absolutely all the chapters, the killer looks up, proud, while music sounds alive and strong, like a hymn, which rises almost a diva, a woman killer. Thus, printing a positive character in his act. Some even argued that such killings are fair, to the extent that these are actions that compensate for the mistreatment suffered by the protagonists. What's behind this idea is the identification of justice with the law of retaliation.
would have to ask ourselves whether, in fact, this program is a vindication of the female. Personally, I'm sure not. A plastic surgeon uses a woman and she smashes her face with acid, a son of a bitch bet your house in exchange for sex with three sisters, lost the bet, but do not agree, then they kill them and stabbed to death . A man harassed a tenant and she literally cook it in tamales. At bottom, the series shows that women are able to do things the same or worse than what we have suffered. This reminds me of that movie, The Witches of Eastwick , that should have been called The bitches of Eastwick , where the three main characters (played by Cher, Susan Sarandon and Michelle Pfeiffer) are subject to the devil and win, in other words: women are worse than the devil.
The real vindication of our gender is not allowed to be violated, or engage in violence against others. Only thus can we distinguish that which we condemn.
The reasons vary: some women kill because of some disorder, bigotry, jealousy, revenge. However, most cases share a fact: they were battered. Finally, in all, absolutely all the chapters, the killer looks up, proud, while music sounds alive and strong, like a hymn, which rises almost a diva, a woman killer. Thus, printing a positive character in his act. Some even argued that such killings are fair, to the extent that these are actions that compensate for the mistreatment suffered by the protagonists. What's behind this idea is the identification of justice with the law of retaliation.
would have to ask ourselves whether, in fact, this program is a vindication of the female. Personally, I'm sure not. A plastic surgeon uses a woman and she smashes her face with acid, a son of a bitch bet your house in exchange for sex with three sisters, lost the bet, but do not agree, then they kill them and stabbed to death . A man harassed a tenant and she literally cook it in tamales. At bottom, the series shows that women are able to do things the same or worse than what we have suffered. This reminds me of that movie, The Witches of Eastwick , that should have been called The bitches of Eastwick , where the three main characters (played by Cher, Susan Sarandon and Michelle Pfeiffer) are subject to the devil and win, in other words: women are worse than the devil.
The real vindication of our gender is not allowed to be violated, or engage in violence against others. Only thus can we distinguish that which we condemn.
